Main

February 17, 2006

Competing on Analytics Symposium: A Field Report

I should've posted this a while back, but forgot. Hey, I'm human. That said, let's explore what all the fuss was about...

Trendpointe's Roger Meyer reports on the recent Competing on Analytics Symposium presented by Harvard Business School Press. He says that BI is evolving- from technology to strategy to brand attribute!

"The net takeaway of the symposium - aside from the lesson that if you can afford to hold an affair at the Metropolitan Club, you should - is that analytics can make a difference. The big remaining question is this: How far into the organization can you reasonably expect an analytics strategy to penetrate before running into a wall of resistance from people who just don't get it?"

The "Quick Takes" sidebar of Meyer's article contains a gem from Irving "Bubba" Tyler, the former CIO of Quaker Chemical: "I do have a problem with companies that miss the opportunity to use BI as part of their everyday process," he said. "You don't have to be a rocket scientist to contribute small but important incremental improvements. Every individual in a company is already making decisions."

Jim Davis, the chief marketing officer of SAS tells Meyer not to expect "analytics to march "out of the backroom and into the boardroom" in the next couple of months. "But the strategic power of business intelligence is more and more in the forefront of executive thinking -- even if they don't fully understand it."

Davis' view is that "we need to push out information to the greatest number of users in an organization and create a culture that bases strategy on fact-based decisioning." He suggests the creation of Business Intelligence Competency Centers which function as a central location and collective memory for driving and supporting an enterprise-wide information strategy, coordinating current efforts, and ensuring that information and best practices are shared throughout the organization.

Like any initiative requiring behavioral change, BI "implementations" are going to succeed or fail based on the human factor. As Laurence Haughton might say, you gotta get around the CAVE people.

BTW, another report on the symposium comes to us from the good people at BI Review. Read all about how P&G got analytics!

February 16, 2006

Beyond the Big Box Backlash

One company that is certainly competing on analytics these days is Britain's supermarket giant, Tesco. The company gathers most of its data from its successful Clubcard. With 12 million cards in use in the UK, Tesco can closely watch what its shoppers are purchasing. It then explores linkages between the products people presently buy and the ones they might be persuaded to buy next. “We believe we have one of the largest databases anywhere in the world,” says Martin Hayward of dunnhumby, which handles data management for the company. right

Now, Tesco is bringing these capabilities to America. The company plans to launch new stores on the U.S. West Coast in 2007 with a convenience-store format and intends to annually invest £250 million ($436.1 million) on the expansion. In fact, half of Tesco's shelf space is now outside the UK. It has already set up shop in China and other emerging market.

The interesting thing to watch, however, is how the company will use analytics to determine how to localize, not merely globalize, its offerings. As Bain consultants Darrell Rigby and Paul Rogers pointed out this week in the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Tesco is among the retailers that now recognize "regional market share is even more important than national scale if they are to grow profitably. An industry built on the principle that success requires standardization is now widely adopting strategies of localization."

Why is that? As the writers put it:

"Local communities are growing more diverse in age, wealth, ethnicity and lifestyle. Moreover, many locales are saturated with big-box outlets and customers are rebelling...In response, some leading retailers are customizing their offerings to appeal to neighborhood tastes and needs. It hinges on getting the balance right: Too much localization can cause costs to spike; too much standardization leads to stagnation. Industry leaders have focused on understanding which elements of a business should be considered for localization, how costly they are to customize, and how much impact they'll have from store to store."

The authors point out that retailers can and should now leverage their knowledge -- drawn from shopper cards and other information gathering resources -- to better understand local tastes and desires -- just as Tesco has done in the UK and elsewhere. "Downtown Tesco Metro stores, for example, often provide sandwiches at lunchtime, and create prepared dinner meals for customers to pick up on their way home," they explain. "The smaller Tesco Express store concept aims to appeal to convenience shoppers with a mix of groceries and household items. No surprise, then, that Tesco Express provides a model for the American convenience stores that Tesco plans to open in 2007."

WalMart, which has experienced the real brunt of the Big Box Backlash also is onboard with this localization strategy. It calls its new initiative "Store of the Community," tailoring formats, products and other services to local clientele. For example, readymade meals are provided at stores near office parks; pharmacies are expanded at stores near hospitals.

"Through its Retail Link program, Wal-Mart works with suppliers to tailor store merchandise with precision," the Bain consultants write. "Retail Link provides both local Wal-Mart managers and vendors with a two-year history of every item's daily sales." Explaining the analytical aspects of Retail Link:

It then creates maps of local customer demand, indicating which merchandise should be stocked when and where. For example, Wal-Mart stocks about 60 types of canned chili in the U.S. but carries only three nationwide. The rest are allocated according to local tastes. Five years ago, Wal-Mart used just five planograms -- diagrams showing how and where products should be placed on retail shelves -- to adapt its soup selection to local preferences. Today, Wal-Mart and its suppliers use more than 200 finely tuned planograms and have raised soup's growth rate by several points.

As Rigby and Rogers conclude, such retail localization leads to "a host of operational advantages -- higher sales productivity, fewer markdowns and faster inventory turns, among others. Just as meaningful, localization has kicked off a new round of innovation among retailers, by forcing executives and store managers to ask, "What if each store was our only store?" Indeed, the growing momentum of localization is a counterpoint to the assumption that the world will be packed with indistinguishable big boxes selling the same goods and services to everyone."

February 02, 2006

Management Innovation: Competing on Analytics

Is "competing on analytics" a management innovation worthy of Gary Hamel's "standards"?

Let's see... in his article "The Why, What, and How of Management Innovation," Hamel says:

"A management innovation creates long-lasting advantage when it meets at least one of three conditions:

1. It is based on a novel principle that challenges the orthodoxy
2. it is systemic, involving a range of processes and methods
3. it is part of a program of invention, where progress compounds over time"

Check, check, check.

Looks like "competing on analytics" meets all three conditions.

Hamel lists a dozen of the most noteworthy management innovations from 1900 to 2000:

1. Scientific management (time and motion studies)
2. Cost accounting and variance analysis
3. The commercial research laboratory (the industrialization of science)
4. ROI analysis and capital budgeting
5. Brand management
6. Large-scale project management
7. Divisionalization
8. Leadership development
9. Industry consortia (multicompany collaborative structures)
10. Radical decentralization (self-organization)
11. Formalized strategic analysis
12. Employee-driven problem solving

Losing out are the following:

- Skunk Works
- account management
- business process reengineering
- employee stock ownership plans.

Says Hamel: "There are more recent innovations that appear quite promising, such as knowledge management, open source development, and internal markets, but it’s too early to assess their lasting impact on the practice of management."

Let's add "competing on analytics" to the list.

The Intelligent Economy is, of course, not just about management innovation. Rather, it's about the process of continuous innovation - sometimes incremental, sometimes radical - with a fundamental focus on results. Not simply measurement, but the right measurements, often in real time... Decisions made not just on data, but on data models (David Maister has one we'll ask him to share with us one of these days).

Now let's apply this notion (competing on analytics) to every field, from branding to business activity management, from communities of practice to talent development, from physical (geographic) clusters to online global ecosystems.

Tom Davenport, you have a winner.